Global vs. Rolling Shutters in Machine Vision: Unraveling the Differences

Image capture is crucial in machine vision to ensure accurate and reliable results. At the heart of this process lies the camera shutter, which controls how light enters the sensor. Two main types of shutters dominate the field: global shutters and rolling shutters. Understanding the differences between these technologies is essential for machine vision engineers, system integrators, and industrial automation professionals to optimize their systems for specific applications.

Global Shutters: Capturing the Moment

Global shutters work by exposing all pixels on the sensor simultaneously. This method of image capture offers several distinct advantages:

  • Distortion-free imaging: Global shutters capture fast-moving objects without distortion or skewing, making them ideal for high-speed motion or vibration applications.

  • Precise timing: The simultaneous exposure of all pixels ensures that every part of the image represents the same moment, which is crucial for accurate measurements and analysis.

However, global shutters also come with some drawbacks:

  • Higher cost and power consumption: The technology behind global shutters is more complex, leading to increased production costs and power requirements.

  • Reduced light sensitivity: Global shutters typically have lower light sensitivity than rolling shutters, which may require additional lighting in some scenarios.

Global shutters are found to be applicable in areas such as robotics, industrial inspections, and high-speed packaging applications, where precise timing and distortion-free imaging are paramount.

Rolling Shutters: A Different Approach

Rolling shutters, in contrast, capture images by scanning across the sensor sequentially, exposing and reading out one line of pixels at a time. This approach offers its own set of advantages:

  • Cost-effective: Rolling shutter technology is simpler and less expensive, making it a popular choice for many applications.

  • Power efficiency: Rolling shutters' sequential nature results in lower power consumption than global shutters. 

  • Enhanced light sensitivity: Rolling shutters generally offer better light sensitivity, allowing for clearer images in low-light conditions.

However, rolling shutters are not without their limitations:

  • Distortion in fast-moving scenes: The sequential exposure can lead to distortion or skewing when capturing rapidly moving objects or during camera motion.

  • Artifacts from flickering lights: Rolling shutters are susceptible to banding or other artifacts caused by flickering light sources, such as some LED lighting.

Rolling shutters are well-suited for applications like security cameras and machine vision systems in controlled environments where motion is limited or predictable.

Choosing the Right Shutter for Your Application

Selecting the appropriate shutter type is crucial for optimizing machine vision performance. Consider the following factors when making your decision:

  • Speed of the object or scene: Global shutters are generally preferred for high-speed applications to avoid distortion.

  • Lighting conditions: Rolling shutters' higher sensitivity may be advantageous for working in low-light environments.

  • Cost and power constraints: Rolling shutters offer a more economical solution with lower power requirements.

  • Accuracy and precision requirements: Global shutters may benefit applications demanding high precision in timing or measurement.

For instance, a machine vision system inspecting products on a high-speed conveyor belt would likely benefit from a global shutter to ensure distortion-free images. Conversely, a security camera monitoring a relatively static scene might perform well with a rolling shutter, taking advantage of its cost-effectiveness and light sensitivity.

The Future of Shutter Technology

We expect further improvements in global and rolling shutter technologies as machine vision technology advances. Manufacturers are working on reducing global shutters' cost and power consumption while enhancing the rolling shutters' performance in dynamic scenes.

Some emerging technologies aim to combine the benefits of both shutter types. For example, some sensors now offer a global reset function with a rolling readout, providing a compromise between the two approaches.

In conclusion, choosing between global and rolling shutters in machine vision applications depends on carefully analyzing each project's requirements. By understanding each technology's strengths and limitations, engineers and integrators can make informed decisions to optimize their machine vision systems for performance, cost-effectiveness, and reliability.

As the field continues to evolve, staying informed about the latest developments in shutter technology will be key to maintaining a competitive edge in machine vision. Contact Phase 1 for more information about our vision solutions!